Home
Contact Us
Newsletter Signup
Our Blogs
The Health Law Blog
The Health Law Firm Blog
Dental Law Blog
Health Facilities Law Blog
Massage Law Blog
Medical Education Law Blog
Marijuana Law Blog
Mental Health Law Blog
Nursing Law Blog
Pharmacy Law Blog
Call:
(407) 331-6620
(850) 439-1001
Toll-Free:
(888) 331-6620
Contact Us Online
Toggle navigation
MENU
About Our Firm
About Our Firm
Attorneys
Board Certified Health Law Attorney
Expert Witness Availability
Available in the Following States
Certified Business Enterprise and SDVOB
Press Releases
Areas of Practice
Areas of Practice
ABIM Representation
Advance Directives and Living Wills
AHCA Background Screening
AHCA Disqualification Waivers
AHCA Employment Disqualifications
Allied World Assurance Company Cases
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
American Professional Agency Cases
Antitrust
Antitrust and Trade Regulation
Appellate Practice Including Appeals of ESOs, Appeals of Final Orders, Appeals of Revocations, Appeals of Veterans Cases
Arbitration
Assisted Living Facility Representation, Adult Day Care Centers, Continuing Care Retirement Communities, Group Homes
Attorney's Fee Expert
Baker Act Cases, Involuntary Confinement
Bioethics
Board Certification
Clinical Investigation Fraud Defense
Clinical Privileges, Fair Hearings, and Peer Review
Commercial Litigation
Complex Litigation, Complex Business Litigation, Complex Commercial Litigation, Class Action Litigation, Multidistrict Litigation
Confidentiality of Medical Records
Corporate Law
Corporations, LLC's, Partnerships and other Business Entities
Covenants-Not-To-Compete
Darwin National Insurance Company Cases
Dentists Advantage Insurance Company Cases
Disruptive Physician Representation
Education Law
Emergency Hearing Representation
Employment Law
Employment, Discrimination, and EEOC Complaints
Fictitious Business Names
Healthcare Law
Healthcare Providers Service Organization (HPSO)
Home Health Agency Cases
Hospital Law
Independent Legal Counsel and Investigations
Informal Dispute Resolution (IDR)
Insurance Defense Attorney for Health Professionals
Intervention Project for Nurses (IPN)
Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Mercer Consumer Services, Mercer Health and Benefits Admin Attorney, Mercer Insurance Attorney Cases
Life Sciences Law
Medicaid and Medicare Audits
Medicaid and Medicare Qui Tam or Whistleblower Cases and False Claims Act
Medicaid and Medicare Revocation
Medicaid Appeal Hearings
Medicaid Audit Defense
Medicaid Cost Reimbursement Report Denials
Medicaid Investigations
Medicaid Litigation
Medicare Appeals
Mergers and Acquisitions
Nondisciplinary Citations and Notices of Noncompliance from Florida Department of Health (DOH)
Nurses Service Organization (NSO) Insurance Company Cases
OneBeacon Insurance Company Attorney and One Beacon Insurance Company Cases
Pain Management
Pain Management and DEA Defense
Peer Review Proceedings
Pharmacy Law and DEA Hearings
Physician Employment Contracts
Physician Student Loan Defense
Podiatric Insurance Company of America Attorney and Podiatric Insurance Company of America Cases
Professionals Resource Network (PRN)
Psychologists, Licensed Mental Health Counselors (LMHCs), Clinical Social Workers (CSWs), and Licensed Marriage and Family Therapists (LMFT) Representation
Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) Attorney
The Doctors Company (TDC) Insurance Cases
Trust Risk Management Services Cases
Volunteer Immunity and Good Samaritan Act
Resources
Resources
Health Law Questions and Answers
Health Law Articles and Documents
Links
List of Publications
Nursing Law Manual
Online Press Kit
Video Library
Our Blogs
The Health Law Blog
The Health Law Firm Blog
Dental Law Blog
Health Facilities Law Blog
Massage Law Blog
Medical Education Law Blog
Marijuana Law Blog
Mental Health Law Blog
Nursing Law Blog
Pharmacy Law Blog
Video Q&A
Contact Us
Pay Online
Go
Confidential Health Information
Employer liability for employee's intentional misuse of protected health information
By Michael L. Smith, R.R.T., J.D.
A patient in New York sued a medical practice because a nurse working at the practice intentionally disclosed the patient's protected health information to the patient's girlfriend without authorization. The court in New York ruled the medical practice was not liable for the intentional wrongful conduct of the employee.
A patient in Indiana sued a pharmacy because a pharmacist intentionally reviewed the protected health information of her husband's former girlfriend, and then disclosed that information to her husband without the former girlfriend's authorization. The jury in that case awarded the former girlfriend $1.4 million.
In both cases, the healthcare providers disclosed protected health information concerning sexually transmitted diseases. In both cases, the employers had trained their employees in the confidentiality of protected health information. The million dollar mistake appears to be that the action taken by the pharmacy in Indiana after it received the patient's complaint was inadequate because the pharmacist was able to repeat the offense. Employers should reexamine their policies and procedures and specifically their disciplinary guidelines for intentional misconduct in order to avoid a judgment comparable to the Indiana case.
The question of an employer's liability for the actions of its employees usually turns on whether the employee was acting within the scope of their employment. Employers are vicariously liable for the negligent actions of their employees committed within the scope of their employment under the doctrine of respondent superior. For example, a restaurant could be held liable for the injuries to one of its patrons caused by a server dropping hot food on the patron. Employers are generally not liable for the intentional acts of their employees unless those acts further the legitimate interests of the employer. A restaurant would probably not be vicariously liable to a patron if the server intentionally attacked a patron due to some personal animosity. Of course, the second patron may be able to pursue other theories of liability against the restaurant particularly if the server had attacked patrons previously.
In the New York case, the court declined to hold the medical practice liable for the deliberate actions of the employee that were not reasonably foreseeable to the employer, and outside the scope of the nurse's employment. According to the facts alleged in the case, the nurse recognized the patient as the boyfriend of her sister-in-law and immediately sent a text message to the sister-in-law about the patient's condition. While practitioners are required to report sexually transmitted diseases to authorities, the nurse was reporting this patient's information for personal reasons and not to comply with any legal requirement. The patient complained to the medical practice and the nurse was terminated immediately.
In the Indiana case, the pharmacist suspected that her husband contracted the sexually transmitted disease from his girlfriend. The pharmacist accessed the patient's protected health information and then reported the information to her husband. The patient learned of the incident, and then complained to the pharmacy. After the patient complained to the pharmacy, the pharmacist accessed the records again. In the lawsuit, the patient claimed the pharmacy was negligent in failing to properly train the pharmacist, and that the pharmacy was negligent in continuing to employ the pharmacist after the wrongful conduct was reported to the pharmacy.
Healthcare employees take notice, employers will almost certainly terminate any employee who intentionally discloses protected health information for their own personal interests. The employer's risk to retain the errant employee is simply too great to retain the employee. An employee that has intentionally disclosed protected health information has violated federal and state laws, as well as, the professional obligations of their practice. An employee who will intentionally violate those laws and their professional obligations is highly likely to repeat that conduct despite any remedial action short of termination taken by the employer. An employer cannot afford to keep those rogue employees because the risk to the employer is tremendous.
Michael L. Smith, JD, RRT is board certified in health law by The Florida Bar and practices at The Health Law Firm in Altamonte Springs, Fla. This article is for general information only and is not a substitute for formal legal advice.
This article was originally published in
Advance for Respiratory Care and Sleep Medicine
.
About Our Firm
Areas of Practice
Attorney Profiles
Board Certified Health Law Attorney
Available in Following States
Health Law Q & A
Testimonials
Nursing Law Manual
Articles & Documents to Read & Download
Our Blogs
The Health Law Blog
The Health Law Firm Blog
Dental Law Blog
Health Facilities Law Blog
Massage Law Blog
Medical Education Law Blog
Marijuana Law Blog
Mental Health Law Blog
Nursing Law Blog
Pharmacy Law Blog
Video & Audio Library
Press Releases
List of Publications
Location & Directions
Photo Gallery
Certified Business Enterprise & SDVOB
Representative Cases
Links
Online Press Kit
Contact Us
Home
Join Our Email List
Seven Things To Know When You Receive A Notice Of Investigation From The Department Of Health
Download
FREE
Copy!
About Our Firm
|
Areas of Practice
|
Resources
|
Contact Us
|
Our Blogs
The Health Law Blog
The Health Law Firm Blog
Dental Law Blog
Health Facilities Law Blog
Massage Law Blog
Medical Education Law Blog
Marijuana Law Blog
Mental Health Law Blog
Nursing Law Blog
Pharmacy Law Blog
|
Site Map
|
Home
The Health Law Firm is certified as a Service-Disabled Veteran Owned (SDVO) Business and a Certified Business Enterprise (CBE)
by the Florida Office of Supplier Diversity (OSD).
Main Office
• 1101 Douglas Ave., Suite 1000, Altamonte Springs FL, 32714
By Appointment
• 37 N. Orange Ave., Suite 500, Orlando, FL 32801
By Appointment
• 201 E. Government St., Pensacola, FL 32502
•
Telephone:
(407) 331-6620
&
(850) 439-1001
•
Telefax: (407) 331-3030
Medicare/Medicaid Audits, Health Care Law, Contracts, Hospital Privileges Hearings, Investigations, DEA Defense, Board of Medicine Defense, Fraud Defense, Administrative Hearings, PRN, IPN, Professional Licensing, Medicare/Medicaid Fraud Defense, Nursing Law, Compliance Plans, Hospital Law, Board of Dentistry, Board of Nursing, Board of Pharmacy, Board of Psychology, White Collar Crime, Pain Management and Pain Medicine Physician Defense, Pain Management Clinic Defense, Zone Program Integrity Contractor (ZPIC) Audit Defense, Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) Audit Defense, Medicaid Fraud Control Unit (MFCU) Defense, Search Warrant and Subpoena Defense, Board of Psychology Defense, NBME Representation, U.S.M.L.E. Challenges, ABIM Representation, Medical Exam Cheating Defense...
and more
Available in the following Florida cities and counties: Daytona Beach, Fort Lauderdale, Gainesville, Jacksonville, Key West, Melbourne, Miami, Ocala, Orlando, Pensacola, Panama City, Sarasota, St. Petersburg, Tallahassee, Tampa, West Palm Beach, Alachua, Baker, Bay, Bradford, Brevard, Broward, Calhoun, Charlotte, Citrus, Clay, Collier, Columbia, Dade, De Soto, Dixie, Duval, Escambia, Flagler, Franklin, Gadsden, Gilchrist, Glades, Gulf, Hamilton, Hardee, Hendry, Hernando, Highlands, Hillsborough, Holmes, Indian River, Jackson, Jefferson, Lafayette, Lake, Lee, Leon, Levy, Liberty, Madison, Manatee, Marion, Martin, Monroe, Nassau, Okaloosa, Okeechobee, Orange, Osceloa, Palm Beach, Pasco, Pinellas, Polk, Putnam, St. Johns, St. Lucie, Santa Rosa, Sarasota, Seminole, Sumter, Suwannee, Taylor, Union, Volusia, Wakulla, Walton, and Washington
By making this website information available for those who access it does not constitute doing business in or having a presence in any state or jurisdiction, nor does it constitute an advertisement sent to or a solicitation made in any state or jurisdiction. This firm is located in and maintains a presence in only those states where the firm maintains an actual physical office. Its attorneys are only admitted to practice in those states specifically listed on their resumes.
Available in the following states*: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming
Disclaimer
|
Terms of Representation
The Health Law Firm logo shown above is a registered Service Mark of George F. Indest III, P.A. - The Health Law Firm, since 2007.
“The Health Law Firm” is a registered fictitious business name of and a registered service mark of
The Health Law Firm
, P.A., a Florida professional service corporation, since 1999. Copyright © 2023 The Health Law Firm. All rights reserved.
Content Management System
by
Sales & Marketing Technologies